Health and Medicine: Premature Babies in the NICU (Then and Now) 

Essay 3 Final

Modern Image: NICU Incubator – Draeger.com 

Historical Image: Early Baby Incubator – History.com 

  
1. How did incubators first come into use for premature babies, and why were they displayed publicly?  
In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, incubators were not commonly used in hospitals. Many physicians believed premature infants were unlikely to survive and did not view specialized care as worthwhile. Because of this, early incubators were often displayed publicly at fairs, exhibitions, and boardwalk attractions. These displays, sometimes referred to as “incubator baby shows,” charged admission, and the money collected helped pay for the babies’ medical care. These exhibitions helped demonstrate that premature infants could survive when provided with warmth and protection, eventually leading to broader medical acceptance of incubators in hospitals (“Circus Babies”).  
  
2. What challenges did early medical professionals face in keeping premature babies alive before modern technology existed?  
Early medical professionals faced serious challenges when caring for premature infants. Incubators at the time were mainly heated boxes with no ability to regulate oxygen, humidity, or airflow. Nurses relied heavily on observation, such as monitoring skin color, breathing patterns, and body temperature. Infection was a major cause of infant death due to limited sterilization practices and the lack of antibiotics. Infant mortality rates were extremely high during this period because medical staff had few tools to prevent complications or respond to sudden changes in an infant’s condition (National Institutes of Health).  
  
3. How have neonatal incubators evolved technologically, from simple heating boxes to digital life-support systems?  
Modern neonatal incubators are highly advanced medical devices designed to support fragile infants. Today’s incubators precisely control temperature, humidity, and oxygen levels while continuously monitoring vital signs such as heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation. Neonatal intensive care units now use ventilators, CPAP machines, and infusion pumps to provide life-sustaining support, allowing healthcare teams to respond quickly to changes in an infant’s condition (March of Dimes).  
  
4. How has the role of nurses and parents changed in the care of premature babies?  
In the past, parents were often kept away from premature infants due to concerns about infection. Modern NICUs now emphasize family-centered care and encourage parental involvement. Nurses support practices such as skin-to-skin contact, also known as kangaroo care, which helps stabilize heart rate, breathing, and body temperature while promoting bonding between parents and infants (March of Dimes).  
  
5. What impact has modern neonatal care had on survival rates, costs, and long-term outcomes for premature infants?  
Advances in neonatal care have significantly increased survival rates for premature infants. Babies born as early as 23 or 24 weeks now have a chance of survival, which was rarely possible in the past. Improved technology and early intervention have reduced long-term complications, although neonatal intensive care remains expensive and often requires extended hospital stays (National Institutes of Health).  
  
6. How does the comparison between past and present NICUs reflect broader changes in how society values life, technology, and care?  
The contrast between early incubators and modern NICUs highlights major changes in medical practice and social values. Early care focused mainly on basic survival and often occurred in experimental or public settings. Modern NICUs prioritize safety, comfort, family involvement, and long-term development, reflecting a broader commitment to protecting vulnerable lives.  

Works Cited  

  
“Circus Babies: The Past, Present, and Future of the Neonatal Incubator.” Illumin, University of Southern California,  
https://illumin.usc.edu/circus-babies-the-past-present-and-future-of-the-neonatal-incubator/.  

History.com Editors. “Baby Incubators: From Boardwalk Sideshows to Modern NICUs.” History.com, A&E Television Networks, 17 Oct. 2023, 

“Infant Mortality and Neonatal Care Advancements.” National Institutes of Health, 2023,  
https://www.nih.gov/ 

 “Preterm Birth and Its Complications.” March of Dimes, 2024,  
https://www.marchofdimes.org/

“Neonatal Incubators & Thermoregulation.” Draeger.com, https://www.draeger.com/en-us_us/Home 

My Portfolio: A Journey in Care, Learning, and Growth  

At the beginning of this semester, I really didn’t think of myself as a strong writer. Honestly, I still don’t! Writing has never come naturally to me, and I’ve always felt more comfortable explaining things out loud than putting them on paper. In my Writer’s Autobiography at the start of the course, I talked about how writing usually made me feel stressed and unsure of myself, especially when it came to organization and knowing if I was doing things the right way. As the semester went on, though, I started to realize that writing doesn’t have to be perfect to be effective. This class helped me see that my experiences and voice actually matter, and that writing can be a way to reflect and explain things instead of something to be afraid of.  

The first essay in my portfolio, “Being a Detox Nurse: Hard but Worth It,” really shows my personal voice and my ability to tell a story. This essay is very close to me because it comes directly from my work as a detox nurse. One part that really shows my growth as a writer is how I focused on one patient and followed her story from beginning to end. I used detailed descriptions of the facility, her condition, and her progress to help the reader understand what detox nursing is really like. This essay shows that I can stay focused on one main idea and develop it with detail, emotion, and reflection instead of just listing events.   

Being a Detox Nurse: Hard but Worth It!   

The hardest job I’ve ever done, besides being a mom, is being a detox nurse. Every day I walk into work knowing I’m responsible for people’s lives while they’re going through withdrawal, and that’s a heavy weight to carry.  I am responsible for these people’s lives.  Every shift I work, I walk in and have to buzz myself in with my badge. You have to go through 2 locked security doors to get into the main area.  It’s all for safety and security, so our court -mandated section 35 patients don’t elope.  It really sets a serious tone the moment you arrive. The walls are a dull gray, the lighting is harsh and fluorescent, and everything feels a little cold and sterile, more like a hospital than a place of healing. There’s not much color or comfort, just that faint smell of disinfectant that never really goes away.   

Most patients we get are still intoxicated upon arrival.  Some are not very alert and can barely make it through the admission process, and some are really starting to get sick.  You can already see the signs of withdrawal.  These people have usually been trying to detox themselves at home but end up becoming scared of what they are experiencing and come in to be safe. Detoxing, especially from Alcohol and Benzodiazepines is extremely dangerous.  Some are tremulous, shaking so bad they can barely hold a cup of water. Some are drenched in sweat, pale, and weak. A lot of them have chills, get nauseous, and even vomit . Their bodies are just going through hell trying get rid of the poison inside of their bodies. Some even have withdrawal seizures.  It’s not pretty.  Detoxing never is. People are scared, angry, sad, and just sick. My job is to keep them safe, check their vitals, give them meds, and help them through one of the hardest things they’ll ever do. It takes a lot of patience, heart, and sometimes just plain toughness.   

One Patient I’ll Never Forget   

I’ve had many patients over the past two years, but there is one patient that has stayed with me. I don’t know exactly why, but she has.  She was one of my first patients at the treatment center.  For confidentiality reasons, I’ll call her J.  She’s about fifty years old, with long, dirty-blonde hair that always looks a little tangled and un-kept. Her clothes soiled and torn. Her face shows the years of struggle, tired eyes, sunken cheeks, and just plain hurt and sadness.  She just looks like life has been too hard on her.    

J has been back to detox about six times in the past three months.  One particular time she was sent out to the ED for a wound on her foot.  She had an infection that was so bad that she needed IV antibiotics.  She was admitted to the hospital for about a week. The day she returned to my facility, I was on shift. I went out to the reception area past the two security doors and signed for the EMS to release her.  I was happy to see that she was okay.  Infections are no joke, especially one that you need IV antibiotics for.  We went into the intake room to readmit her into our system. When patients are admitted to hospital, we have to discharge them out of our system.  Before I could get signed into the computer to re-admit her, she started saying she was going to go.  She became anxious and restless and couldn’t sit still.  She told me she had to leave and couldn’t stay.  She was so desperate to leave all of a sudden. She was saying she had to go move her truck from where it was parked, or it would be towed. J is homeless and lives out of her truck most of the time. “I have all of my stuff in there. I have to go move it.” It was obvious to me that she wanted to leave to go use drugs.  I tried to convince her to stay, but I had no success.  Staff retrieved her belongings from the locked warehouse where we keep every patient’s things.  She was so eager to leave that as she was going through her things in the hallway, y she started handing me things, telling me to “just throw it out.” She didn’t even want to wait for her shoes.  Her foot was wrapped up with a bandage to protect the wound, she was also wearing a non-slip sock on that foot, and there was a shoe on the other.  We were trying to find her a shoe or slipper to fit over the bulky wrapped foot, something to protect the foot.  It was raining out, and she was still getting over the infection. J was not waiting.  “Oh man, I really need to go.”  “I’ll be fine with this,” pointing to her foot with the nonslip sock on it.  I again pleaded with her to stay.  “I’m gonna come back,” she said.  “I’m moving my truck, and I’ll be back,” to which I replied, “You promise you’ll come back?”  And she said in her raspy voice, “I promise.” I helped her put her stuff in her backpack and walked her back through the security doors.   As she rushed out into the parking lot, she turned and called out, “I’ll be back!” I yelled after her, “I really hope so; we’ll be here!” I remember standing there watching her go, feeling sad for her and wondering if she would ever make it back here.    

When someone has not used drugs in a while and then goes back to using, they think they can handle the same amount /strength / strength of drugs as they did before. Well, they can’t, and a lot of people overdose and die. I didn’t know if she would make it back.  She never came back that day, or the day after, or even the week after. She did eventually make it back; she was broken again, dope sick! Withdrawing from fentanyl. She came in with her head down, nose dripping, unbathed, sweating, itchy, and tremulous.  I was happy to see her. She made it back to us.  I remember thinking, “Maybe this time will be it for her; maybe she will stay longer this time; maybe she will make it!”   

She stayed with us for about three weeks this time.  Every time I went up to her unit, I’d look for her to see if she was still there. She is always so kind, respectful, and sweet.  When I’d see her, she’d smile and tell me, “I’m still here; I’m going to do this this time.” And she looked it.  Her hair was washed and braided neatly, her eyes bright blue again, and her skin glowing. She was dressed in jeans and a cozy sweater instead of the torn clothes she first came in with or the facility-issued, maroon-colored scrubs the detox patients need to wear.  She looked beautiful, inside and out.  There was hope in her again; her soul was finally starting to heal.  She left us a few days ago. She was going to a halfway house.  On to continuing her treatment.  When I asked her how she was feeling about the transition, she told me she was excited, hopeful, and nervous.  When she left, she thanked all of us nurses and left us a card she made that expressed her appreciation for us.  This is what motivates me to keep doing this job. Knowing I have helped someone and made them feel cared about.    

I once asked her if she still wanted to keep trying to get sober and what makes her keep trying. She said yes, and she keeps trying because she loves herself and she doesn’t want to die.  That answer hit me hard.  It’s heartbreaking to watch her, or any patient for that matter, return again and again, but at the same time, I’m thankful they keep making it back to us instead of dying out there on the street.  I hope that the next time I hear about her, it’s because she’s doing well.  My wish for her and every other patient is that someday they’ll come back just to visit and tell us they are living clean, sober, and beautiful.   

There are days this job breaks my heart, and days when it fills it right back up. Some shifts feel really heavy, the sights, the smells, the exhaustion, and the constant worrying if someone will make it through the day without having a seizure, overdose or die. But then there are moments that remind me why I do this. When a patient finally sleeps after days of being sick or says “thank you” through tears, or even just smiles for the first time in a while.  Those are the moments that matter.  They might seem small, but working in this field with so much sadness and pain, the small wins are everything.  They’re proof that the human spirit, heart, and soul are still alive underneath all the pain. Those moments remind me that being a detox nurse isn’t just about medicine; it’s about caring about what you do, showing kindness and patience, lending an ear to listen, lending a shoulder to cry on, and giving people hope when they’ve lost it.   

Being a detox nurse, you see people change right in front of you; sometimes they look completely different, better, even after just a week. You also see how strong addiction is when they relapse. There’s a mix of heartbreak and hope every single day. Being a detox nurse isn’t easy. The hours are long, the work is stressful, and the stories weigh heavy on my heart. But the reward is real. I get to see people at their lowest and sometimes watch them rise again, even if it doesn’t last forever. Helping someone through just one part of their journey matters. Every detox is another chance, and as long as people keep coming back, I’ll keep showing up for them.  

The second essay, “Brave New World Dept.: Prompt Diagnosis,” shows a different side of my writing. This piece helped me practice summarizing and responding to an article while still keeping my own voice. I had to clearly explain what the author was saying before sharing my own opinion, which was something I struggled with in the past. A specific part that shows my growth is when I connected the article to my own experience with looking up my thyroid levels online. That example helped support my response while still staying on topic. This essay shows that I can organize information clearly and balance research with personal experience.  

Brave New World Dept.: Prompt Diagnosis   

A lot of people use A.I. now to check their symptoms before calling a doctor. It’s becoming normal in healthcare, but it also makes people wonder how safe it really is. In the article “Brave New World Dept.: Prompt Diagnosis,” Dhruv Khullar explains how A.I. can help doctors and patients, but he also points out the problems it can cause. I also read a short piece from the Mayo Clinic that says online symptom checkers and A.I. should be used carefully because they can be wrong (“Symptom Checkers”). Both sources show that A.I. can be helpful, but people still need real medical advice from real medical professionals.   

In “Brave New World Dept.: Prompt Diagnosis,” Dhruv Khullar talks about how A.I. is becoming a bigger part of medical care. He starts with the story of Matthew Williams, a man who had stomach problems for years. He went to different doctors but still didn’t get answers. When he typed his symptoms into ChatGPT, the A.I. suggested that oxalates might be causing his issues. This ended up being correct, and changing his diet helped him. Khullar uses this example to show how A.I. can sometimes help when doctors haven’t found the answer yet.   

Khullar then explains how A.I. systems are being used to train medical students. He talks about an A.I. tool called CaBot that was tested at Harvard. CaBot solved a very hard medical case in just a few minutes, while the doctor it was compared to took weeks to figure it out. Khullar says A.I. can go through a huge amount of information very fast, which is something humans cannot do on their own. He also explains that doctors might use A.I. to get quick first ideas for diagnoses or to double-check their thoughts, almost like getting a second opinion.   

Even though A.I. can be helpful, Khullar makes it clear that it also has problems. He shares examples of times when A.I. gave dangerous or totally wrong advice. One man got sick because A.I. told him to use a bad salt substitute. Khullar says A.I. can “hallucinate,” meaning it gives answers that sound confident but are not true. He also talks about privacy concerns and warns that doctors could lose some of their thinking skills if they depend too much on A.I.   

Khullar also says that A.I. is being used in other countries, like Kenya, where doctors use a system called AI Consult to check their own diagnoses. He calls this a “centaur” approach, which means humans and A.I. working together. He explains that A.I. is most helpful with unusual or complicated cases. For regular, common problems, A.I. doesn’t really add much. Khullar ends by saying A.I. should support doctors, not replace them, and that real medical decisions still need human judgment.  

I connected with this article right away because I had a similar experience to one of the examples. Not long ago, I looked up why my TSH and T4 levels were high. Google told me I had hyperthyroidism. I already knew I had hypothyroidism, so I was confused and honestly a little scared. I ended up calling my doctor, and they explained that a high TSH means the thyroid is underactive. What Google told me was the complete opposite. This experience showed me exactly what Khullar meant when he said A.I. can sound confident but still be wrong.   

I also understand what Khullar says about how people use A.I. as a quick check before they talk to a doctor. That’s exactly what I did. The Mayo Clinic says symptom checkers should only be used for basic information and not for real diagnosing (“Symptom Checkers”). That makes sense because A.I. doesn’t know your full medical history. It doesn’t know anything personal about you. It just gives an answer based on typing. In my case, the answer didn’t match what was actually going on with my body.   

Overall, I agree with Khullar that A.I. can be helpful as long as people don’t depend on it too much. It can give ideas or help someone know what to ask their doctor, but it shouldn’t take the place of real medical care. My experience showed me why you always have to double-check with a doctor. A.I. might have a lot of information, but it doesn’t know me the way my doctor does. After going through that, I know I won’t rely on A.I. for anything serious again.   

Works Cited   

Khullar, Dhruv. “Brave New World Dept.: Prompt Diagnosis.” The New Yorker, 29 Sept. 2025. Gale OneFile: High School Edition, https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=STOM&u=mlin_s_bristcc&id=GALE%7CA856566465&v=2.1&it=r&sid=bookmark-STOM&asid=5ec12c8d.   

“Symptom Checkers: Can You Trust Them?” Mayo Clinic, 2024, www.mayoclinic.org/symptom-checkers.   

The third essay, “Should Nurses Be Allowed to Refuse Unsafe Assignments?”, is my final draft of Essay 4 and the piece that best shows how much my writing has improved. When I started brainstorming, I thought about a few different healthcare topics, but I chose unsafe nurse assignments because it’s something I deal with in real life and feel strongly about. For prewriting, I spent time reading research studies, nursing organization guidelines, and government information, while also thinking about my own experiences at work. Writing the first draft took several sittings and was challenging because I had to combine research with personal knowledge. After receiving feedback, I made changes by moving my thesis, improving organization, strengthening my argument, and fixing citations. Revising this essay helped me see how feedback can actually make my writing clearer and stronger.  

This essay also shows growth in how I organize and support an argument. One part that stands out is where I address the hospital administrators’ arguments about cost and staffing shortages and explain why those arguments don’t hold up in real healthcare settings. That section shows that I can focus on one idea, respond to opposing viewpoints, and support my points with evidence.  

Should Nurses Be Allowed to Refuse Unsafe Assignments?  

Every day at work, I walk into an unsafe situation. We have no security in the building and care for unpredictable, sometimes violent patients. Staffing is always short, and it often feels like a riot could break out at any moment. All we have is a call button that alerts the police, and if something does happen, we are left waiting for them to arrive. This is the reality of my job every single shift. When I am responsible for multiple detoxing patients with only one other nurse and a few staff members caring for nearly forty patients, it is hard not to wonder how any of this is considered safe. Unsafe assignments are not just busy days. They are dangerous situations that put patients and nurses at risk, and nurses should have legal protection to refuse unsafe assignments without fear of being written up or fired.  

Unsafe assignments do more than exhaust nurses physically and emotionally; they increase the risk of serious harm. Research shows that when nurses are responsible for too many patients, the likelihood of errors, missed assessments, and complications increases (Needleman et al.). When nurses are stretched too thin, important signs of patient decline can be missed, medications can be delayed, and care becomes rushed instead of safe and thoughtful. The American Nurses Association also links unsafe staffing levels to burnout and emotional exhaustion, which further affects patient care (“Nurse Staffing”). Nurses want to provide quality care and build trust with patients, but when assignments are unsafe, it becomes impossible to meet patient needs. This impacts patient safety, nurse well-being, and the healthcare system as a whole.  

Despite these risks, the legal protections for nurses who refuse unsafe assignments are limited and unclear. There is no federal law that clearly protects nurses from retaliation when they refuse an unsafe assignment. Instead, protections vary by state and by hospital policy. Some states allow nurses to file objection or “safe harbor” forms, but these do not always prevent discipline, write-ups, or job loss. In many cases, hospitals still hold the power to punish nurses even when assignments are unsafe. This lack of clear legal protection leaves nurses feeling forced to choose between protecting their license and protecting their patients.  

Some organizations argue that refusing unsafe assignments is actually a way to protect patient safety. The Massachusetts Nurses Association explains that refusing an unsafe assignment can be appropriate when done correctly and with proper documentation (“Accepting, Rejecting & Delegating”). The Joint Commission also emphasizes that safe staffing is essential to meeting national patient safety goals (“National Patient Safety Goals”). Research supports this position. A large study found that hospitals with lower registered nurse staffing levels had higher patient mortality rates (Griffiths et al.). These findings show that unsafe assignments are not minor inconveniences, but serious safety risks that can lead to life-threatening outcomes.  

Hospital administrators often argue against allowing nurses to refuse assignments, mainly for financial reasons. Labor costs make up more than half of hospital expenses, and administrators claim that hiring additional staff is too expensive (“AHA Hospital Statistics”). They argue that allowing nurses to refuse assignments would create staffing chaos and disrupt operations. From their perspective, refusal threatens efficiency and profitability.  

Another common argument is the nursing shortage. The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects that nearly 193,000 new registered nurse positions will be needed each year through 2031 due to retirements and nurses leaving the profession (Bureau of Labor Statistics). Hospital leaders use this data to argue that there are not enough nurses available, and that refusal would worsen staffing problems. However, this argument ignores the fact that unsafe working conditions are a major reason nurses leave in the first place. Allowing nurses to refuse unsafe assignments could actually help retain experienced nurses by improving working conditions.  

There are also legal concerns related to patient abandonment. The Washington State Department of Health warns that refusing an assignment without following proper procedures could be interpreted as abandonment, which may lead to disciplinary action (“Questions of Assignment”). Nurses are often pressured with statements such as “just follow orders” or “my license will cover you,” making it even harder to speak up. This creates a system where nurses feel legally vulnerable for prioritizing safety.  

Some administrators argue that technology and temporary staffing solve the problem. However, research does not support this claim. A study in the International Journal of Nursing Studies found that when nurse staffing levels decrease during a shift, the risk of inpatient death increases (Musy et al.). Technology cannot replace hands-on nursing care, and temporary staff may not be familiar enough with a unit’s routines, patients, or safety risks to manage complex situations effectively.  

These arguments fall apart when real-world healthcare is considered. Nurses do not refuse assignments to avoid work; they refuse because they fear serious harm will occur. Unsafe assignments are a major contributor to burnout and turnover. The National Academy of Medicine reports that burnout affects up to half of all nurses, largely due to excessive workloads (National Academy of Medicine). Punishing nurses for speaking up only pushes more of them out of the profession.  

Unsafe staffing is also costly for hospitals. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality estimates that preventable errors, infections, falls, and complications add more than $30 billion in extra healthcare costs each year (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality). While hospitals may view safe staffing as expensive, unsafe staffing ultimately costs more.  

Allowing nurses to refuse unsafe assignments does not mean abandoning patients. Instead, it encourages hospitals to create safer systems and staffing practices. Legal protections could include laws that prevent retaliation, clear procedures for refusing unsafe assignments, and independent review processes. These protections would allow nurses to advocate for patient safety without fear of losing their jobs or licenses.  

Nurses should not have to choose between protecting their patients and protecting their careers. Unsafe assignments place everyone at risk. Giving nurses the legal right to refuse clearly unsafe assignments is not about avoiding responsibility; it is about prioritizing safety. Legal protections for refusing unsafe assignments would benefit nurses, patients, and the healthcare system as a whole.  

Works Cited  

Accepting, Rejecting & Delegating a Work Assignment: A Guide for Nurses. Massachusetts Nurses Association, 2023, https://www.massnurses.org.  

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Patient Safety and Adverse Events. AHRQ, 2023, https://www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/index.html.  

AHA Hospital Statistics. American Hospital Association, 2023, https://www.aha.org/statistics.  

Bureau of Labor Statistics. Registered Nurses: Occupational Outlook Handbook. U.S. Department of Labor, 2023, https://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/registered-nurses.htm.  

Griffiths, Peter, et al. “Nursing Team Composition and Mortality Following Acute Admission.” BMJ Quality & Safety, vol. 28, no. 8, 2019, pp. 609–617.  

Musy, Sarah N., et al. “The Association Between Nurse Staffing and Inpatient Mortality.” International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 120, 2021, article 103950, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34087527/.  

National Academy of Medicine. Taking Action Against Clinician Burnout. National Academies Press, 2019.  

National Patient Safety Goals. The Joint Commission, 2024, https://www.jointcommission.org/standards/national-patient-safety-goals/.  

Needleman, Jack, et al. “Nurse-Staffing Levels and the Quality of Care in Hospitals.” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 364, no. 11, 2011, pp. 1037–1045.  

Questions of Assignment. Washington State Department of Health, June 2022, https://nursing.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2022-06/QsOfAssign.pdf.  

Overall, this semester helped me feel more confident about writing. With the help and feedback from my professor, I learned how to organize essays better, use sources correctly, and revise instead of just fixing grammar. I still want to work on writing more efficiently and trusting myself earlier in the process, but I can clearly see my progress. These essays represent how my writing has grown over the semester and how I’ve learned that writing is a process that gets better with time, effort, and hard work. Hopefully I am prepared for ENG 102.   

Should Nurses be allowed to refuse unsafe assignments ?

Should Nurses Be Allowed to Refuse Unsafe Assignments? 

Every day at work, I walk into an unsafe situation. We have no security in the building and care for unpredictable, sometimes violent patients. Staffing is always short, and it often feels like a riot could break out at any moment. All we have is a call button that alerts the police, and if something does happen, we are left waiting for them to arrive. This is the reality of my job every single shift. When I am responsible for multiple detoxing patients with only one other nurse and a few staff members caring for nearly forty patients, it is hard not to wonder how any of this is considered safe. Unsafe assignments are not just busy days. They are dangerous situations that put patients and nurses at risk, and nurses should have legal protection to refuse unsafe assignments without fear of being written up or fired. 

Unsafe assignments do more than exhaust nurses physically and emotionally; they increase the risk of serious harm. Research shows that when nurses are responsible for too many patients, the likelihood of errors, missed assessments, and complications increases (Needleman et al.). When nurses are stretched too thin, important signs of patient decline can be missed, medications can be delayed, and care becomes rushed instead of safe and thoughtful. The American Nurses Association also links unsafe staffing levels to burnout and emotional exhaustion, which further affects patient care (“Nurse Staffing”). Nurses want to provide quality care and build trust with patients, but when assignments are unsafe, it becomes impossible to meet patient needs. This impacts patient safety, nurse well-being, and the healthcare system as a whole. 

Despite these risks, the legal protections for nurses who refuse unsafe assignments are limited and unclear. There is no federal law that clearly protects nurses from retaliation when they refuse an unsafe assignment. Instead, protections vary by state and by hospital policy. Some states allow nurses to file objection or “safe harbor” forms, but these do not always prevent discipline, write-ups, or job loss. In many cases, hospitals still hold the power to punish nurses even when assignments are unsafe. This lack of clear legal protection leaves nurses feeling forced to choose between protecting their license and protecting their patients. 

Some organizations argue that refusing unsafe assignments is actually a way to protect patient safety. The Massachusetts Nurses Association explains that refusing an unsafe assignment can be appropriate when done correctly and with proper documentation (“Accepting, Rejecting & Delegating”). The Joint Commission also emphasizes that safe staffing is essential to meeting national patient safety goals (“National Patient Safety Goals”). Research supports this position. A large study found that hospitals with lower registered nurse staffing levels had higher patient mortality rates (Griffiths et al.). These findings show that unsafe assignments are not minor inconveniences, but serious safety risks that can lead to life-threatening outcomes. 

Hospital administrators often argue against allowing nurses to refuse assignments, mainly for financial reasons. Labor costs make up more than half of hospital expenses, and administrators claim that hiring additional staff is too expensive (“AHA Hospital Statistics”). They argue that allowing nurses to refuse assignments would create staffing chaos and disrupt operations. From their perspective, refusal threatens efficiency and profitability. 

Another common argument is the nursing shortage. The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects that nearly 193,000 new registered nurse positions will be needed each year through 2031 due to retirements and nurses leaving the profession (Bureau of Labor Statistics). Hospital leaders use this data to argue that there are not enough nurses available, and that refusal would worsen staffing problems. However, this argument ignores the fact that unsafe working conditions are a major reason nurses leave in the first place. Allowing nurses to refuse unsafe assignments could actually help retain experienced nurses by improving working conditions. 

There are also legal concerns related to patient abandonment. The Washington State Department of Health warns that refusing an assignment without following proper procedures could be interpreted as abandonment, which may lead to disciplinary action (“Questions of Assignment”). Nurses are often pressured with statements such as “just follow orders” or “my license will cover you,” making it even harder to speak up. This creates a system where nurses feel legally vulnerable for prioritizing safety. 

Some administrators argue that technology and temporary staffing solve the problem. However, research does not support this claim. A study in the International Journal of Nursing Studies found that when nurse staffing levels decrease during a shift, the risk of inpatient death increases (Musy et al.). Technology cannot replace hands-on nursing care, and temporary staff may not be familiar enough with a unit’s routines, patients, or safety risks to manage complex situations effectively. 

These arguments fall apart when real-world healthcare is considered. Nurses do not refuse assignments to avoid work; they refuse because they fear serious harm will occur. Unsafe assignments are a major contributor to burnout and turnover. The National Academy of Medicine reports that burnout affects up to half of all nurses, largely due to excessive workloads (National Academy of Medicine). Punishing nurses for speaking up only pushes more of them out of the profession. 

Unsafe staffing is also costly for hospitals. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality estimates that preventable errors, infections, falls, and complications add more than $30 billion in extra healthcare costs each year (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality). While hospitals may view safe staffing as expensive, unsafe staffing ultimately costs more. 

Allowing nurses to refuse unsafe assignments does not mean abandoning patients. Instead, it encourages hospitals to create safer systems and staffing practices. Legal protections could include laws that prevent retaliation, clear procedures for refusing unsafe assignments, and independent review processes. These protections would allow nurses to advocate for patient safety without fear of losing their jobs or licenses. 

Nurses should not have to choose between protecting their patients and protecting their careers. Unsafe assignments place everyone at risk. Giving nurses the legal right to refuse clearly unsafe assignments is not about avoiding responsibility; it is about prioritizing safety. Legal protections for refusing unsafe assignments would benefit nurses, patients, and the healthcare system as a whole. 

Works Cited 

Accepting, Rejecting & Delegating a Work Assignment: A Guide for Nurses. Massachusetts Nurses Association, 2023, https://www.massnurses.org. 

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Patient Safety and Adverse Events. AHRQ, 2023, https://www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/index.html. 

AHA Hospital Statistics. American Hospital Association, 2023, https://www.aha.org/statistics. 

Bureau of Labor Statistics. Registered Nurses: Occupational Outlook Handbook. U.S. Department of Labor, 2023, https://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/registered-nurses.htm. 

Griffiths, Peter, et al. “Nursing Team Composition and Mortality Following Acute Admission.” BMJ Quality & Safety, vol. 28, no. 8, 2019, pp. 609–617. 

Musy, Sarah N., et al. “The Association Between Nurse Staffing and Inpatient Mortality.” International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 120, 2021, article 103950, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34087527/. 

National Academy of Medicine. Taking Action Against Clinician Burnout. National Academies Press, 2019. 

National Patient Safety Goals. The Joint Commission, 2024, https://www.jointcommission.org/standards/national-patient-safety-goals/. 

Needleman, Jack, et al. “Nurse-Staffing Levels and the Quality of Care in Hospitals.” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 364, no. 11, 2011, pp. 1037–1045. 

Questions of Assignment. Washington State Department of Health, June 2022, https://nursing.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2022-06/QsOfAssign.pdf. 

Rough Draft Essay 4 Should Nurses Be Allowed to Refuse Unsafe Assignments? 

Rough Draft – Should Nurses Be Allowed to Refuse Unsafe Assignments? 

Every day at work I’m in an unsafe situation.  We have no security in the building, and we deal with unpredictable, sometimes violent patients. We never have enough staff, and honestly, it feels like a riot could break out at any moment. All we have is a call button that alerts the police, and if something happens, we’re basically just standing there waiting for them to get there. That’s the reality I walk into every single shift. When I’m trying to manage multiple detoxing patients with only one other nurse and a couple of staff taking care of about 40 patients, I can’t help thinking, “How is this safe for anyone?” That’s when I started to think about how unsafe assignments aren’t just “busy days.” They’re dangerous, and nurses are expected to handle it as if nothing is wrong. 

Unsafe assignments don’t just drain nurses physically and emotionally; they create situations where real harm can happen. Research shows that when nurses have too many patients at once, the chance of errors, missed assessments, and complications goes up (Needleman et al.). The ANA also connects unsafe staffing to burnout and emotional exhaustion (“Nurse Staffing”). Nurses want to give patients the attention they deserve, but when the assignment itself is unsafe, it becomes impossible to keep up. That affects patient care, nurse mental health, and the entire healthcare system. 

This is why I think us nurses should have the legal protection to refuse unsafe assignments without being written up or fired. The Massachusetts Nurses Association even explains that refusing an unsafe assignment is actually a form of protecting patient safety, as long as it’s done the right way (“Accepting, Rejecting & Delegating”). The Joint Commission also ties safe staffing directly to patient safety goals, which basically means hospitals can’t claim to care about safety if they’re forcing nurses into unsafe workloads (“National Patient Safety Goals”). On top of that, a large study found that hospitals with fewer RNs per patient had higher mortality rates (Griffiths et al.). To me, that shows unsafe assignments are not just inconvenient, they’re dangerous. 

Counterargument: Why Some People Say Nurses Shouldn’t Refuse 

There is another side to this issue, and it’s the one hospital administrators and ceos of medical facilities usually bring up. Their biggest argument is money. They say it costs too much to hire more nurses and that staffing levels are already stretching their budgets. Labor is already over half of hospital expenses, so administrators claim that increasing staffing would hurt them financially (“AHA Hospital Statistics”). From their perspective, if nurses could refuse assignments, it would create chaos in staffing and be too expensive to manage. 

Hospitals also like to talk about the nursing shortage. The Bureau of Labor Statistics predicts that almost 193,000 new RN positions will be needed every year through 2031 because of retirements and people leaving the profession (BLS). Administrators use this to say they don’t have enough nurses to begin with, so refusal would make patient care even harder to maintain. 

There’s also a legal and licensing side to this. According to the Washington State Department of Health’s “Questions of Assignment,” refusing an assignment can be risky if not handled correctly. The document warns that it could even be seen as patient abandonment if a nurse refuses care or walks away without properly handing off responsibility, something that can result in disciplinary action or license problems (“Questions of Assignment”). The guide also shows that nurses are often pressured with phrases like “just follow orders” or “my license will cover you,” which makes it even harder to stand up for yourself when the assignment is unsafe. In other words, the system itself can make refusing assignments feel dangerous. 

Some administrators even argue that new technology makes heavy assignments manageable. They say float nurses, travel nurses, or electronic health record systems help lighten the workload. But research doesn’t back this up. A study published in the International Journal of Nursing Studies found that when nurse staffing drops during a shift, the risk of inpatient death increases (Musy et al.). Technology doesn’t replace hands-on care, and float or travel nurses may not know the unit well enough to handle complex situations safely. 

Why These Arguments Don’t Hold Up 

Even though those points sound good on paper, they fall apart when you look at real healthcare. Most nurses aren’t refusing assignments to get out of working; they’re doing it because they’re scared something bad will happen. Unsafe assignments are one of the biggest reasons nurses quit. The National Academy of Medicine reports that burnout affects up to 50% of nurses, and excessive workloads are a major cause (National Academy of Medicine). If hospitals want to keep nurses, they need to fix the problems that make people leave, not punish nurses for speaking up. 

Unsafe assignments also cost hospitals financially. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality estimates that preventable errors, falls, infections, and complications add over $30 billion in extra hospital costs every year (AHRQ). Many of these happen on understaffed units. So even if hospitals think safe staffing is “too expensive,” unsafe staffing ends up costing more. 

Allowing nurses to refuse unsafe assignments doesn’t mean abandoning patients. It means forcing hospitals and other medical facilities to create safer systems. It gives nurses a voice and protects them from being pushed into situations that are clearly unsafe. And it leads to better patient care because a supported, safe nurse can actually focus, assess properly, and intervene before something goes wrong. 

Conclusion 

Nurses shouldn’t have to choose between protecting their license and protecting their patients. Unsafe assignments put everyone at risk; the nurse, the patients, and the hospital. Giving nurses the right to refuse an assignment that is clearly unsafe isn’t being dramatic or difficult. It’s doing the right thing. It’s putting safety first. Patients deserve to be cared for by nurses who aren’t stretched so thin, and nurses deserve to go home safe at the end of the day. Legal protection for refusing unsafe assignments isn’t just good for nurses, it’s good for healthcare as a whole. 

Works Cited 

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. “Patient Safety and Adverse Events.” AHRQ, 2023,  
https://www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/index.html 

American Hospital Association. AHA Hospital Statistics. AHA, 2023, 
Fast Facts on U.S. Hospitals, 2025 | AHA 

Musy, Sarah N., et al. “The Association between Nurse Staffing and Inpatient Mortality: A Shift-Level Retrospective Longitudinal Study.” International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 120, 2021, article 103950. PubMed, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34087527/

Massachusetts Nurses Association. Accepting, Rejecting & Delegating a Work Assignment: A Guide for Nurses. Massachusetts Nurses Association, 2023, 
Application – Massachusetts Nurses Association 

Needleman, Jack, et al. “Nurse-Staffing Levels and the Quality of Care in Hospitals.” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 364, no. 11, 2011, pp. 1037–1045, 
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa1001025 

Nurse.org. “Can a Nurse Refuse a Patient Assignment? Know Your Rights.” Nurse.org, 29 July 2024, 
https://nurse.org/articles/refusing-unsafe-patient-assignment-nurse/ 

The Joint Commission. National Patient Safety Goals. The Joint Commission, 2024, 
https://www.jointcommission.org/standards/national-patient-safety-goals/ 

Washington State Department of Health. Questions of Assignment. June 2022, 
https://nursing.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2022-06/QsOfAssign.pdf 

Essay 4 Proposal

Essay 4 Proposal 

Research Question: 

Should nurses be allowed to refuse unsafe patient assignments without fear of punishment or losing their jobs? 

Where I Got the Idea: 

I got this idea from my own job. Being a detox nurse I’ve been put in a lot of unsafe situations.  Too many patients at once, violent and or unpredictable patients with mental health issues; without security, not enough staff, and just overall ridiculous expectations from management. Nurses are supposed to “make it work,” even when it’s clearly not safe for us or for the people we’re taking care of. When I saw the information from the Massachusetts Nurses Association about the right to accept or reject an assignment, it made me realize how big this issue really is in the nursing field in general. 

What I Already Know + Possible Position: 

I already know unsafe assignments lead to burnout, injuries, mistakes, and honestly a lot of emotional stress. It also puts patients at risk. I’m leaning toward the position that nurses should have legal protection to refuse unsafe assignments without worrying about getting written up or fired. This interests me because I’ve personally experienced unsafe assignments, and I know a lot of other nurses deal with this all the time too. 

Possible Sources I Might Use: 

  • The Mass Nurses Association explains nurses’ rights when accepting or rejecting assignments. 
  • The Joint Commission provides guidelines on patient safety and staffing. 
  • Studies show unsafe staffing affects patient outcomes, mortality rates, and nurse burnout. 
  • Articles explain what protections nurses currently have and what they’re still lacking. 

Works Cited ‌ 

American Nurses Association (ANA). 
Nurse Staffing: Critical Issues for Patient Safety and Workforce Sustainability.” 
American Nurses Association, 2022, 
Safe Nurse Staffing and Patient Outcomes | ANA 

Griffiths, Peter, et al. 
Nursing Team Composition and Mortality Following Acute Hospital Admission: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.” 
JAMA Network Open, vol. 7, no. 8, 2024, e2428769, 
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.28769

Nurse.org. 
Can a Nurse Refuse a Patient Assignment? Know Your Rights.” 
Nurse.org, 29 July 2024, 
How To Refuse an Unsafe Patient Assignment as a Nurse | Nurse.Org 

Needleman, Jack, et al. 
Nurse-Staffing Levels and the Quality of Care in Hospitals.” 
The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 364, 2011, pp. 1037–1045, 
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1001025

The Joint Commission. 
National Patient Safety Goals.” 
The Joint Commission, 2024, 
https://www.jointcommission.org/en/standards/national-patient-safety-goals/

Massachusetts Nurses Association. 
Accepting, Rejecting & Delegating a Work Assignment: A Guide for Nurses.” 
Massachusetts Nurses Association, 2023, 
Application – Massachusetts Nurses Association 

Peer Review Essay 3

Peer Review Essay 3 

1. Thoughtfulness, Depth, Creativity, Range of Questions 

 I think you did a good job asking real questions about what’s going on in the classroom, not just what the picture shows. You covered a lot; kids struggling with reading, behavior stuff, teacher stress, different supports, all of that. It feels like you really thought about it. If you wanted to add anything, maybe one more question about something we can’t see in the picture, like how teachers get trained for inclusion. But honestly, you already did plenty. 

2. Paragraph Focus + Flow  

Most of your paragraphs stay on track and make sense. It’s easy to follow what you’re talking about. There were just two small spots. The UDL paragraph jumps a little between explaining UDL and talking about the picture, and the cultural inclusion paragraph has two ideas mixed together, so maybe slow that down or separate it. Nothing major, everything else is pretty smooth. 

 3. Depth of Info + Sources  

You definitely used good info. It didn’t feel basic or like common knowledge. The dyslexia paragraph and the emotional/behavior one were super strong because you added real details. The MTSS paragraph could use one small example (like “Tier 1 is whole class” or something) just so people who don’t know MTSS can picture it. But the rest of your research is great. 

 4. MLA Style 

 Only thing I noticed is that you repeated a couple sources in the Works Cited. Besides that, it looks fine to me.  

Overall it looks really good. I actually feel weird critiquing your essay. It is much better than mine. Great Job! 

Rough Draft Annotations

Incubator in the 1920’s

Modern Day Incubator

1. How did incubators first come into use for premature babies, and why were they displayed publicly? 

A long time ago, incubators for premature babies weren’t even used in hospitals. They were shown to the public in places like fairs and on the boardwalk. People would pay money to see the babies, and that money actually helped pay for their care. It sounds strange now, but at that time many doctors didn’t think premature babies could survive, so this was how they proved it was possible. The old photo I’m using shows what it looked like back then, a nurse standing near a tiny baby while people watched. It’s wild to think something that started out as a public display ended up changing medicine and saving lives. 

  

2. What challenges did early medical professionals face in keeping premature babies alive before modern technology existed? 

Back in the early days, they didn’t have all the machines and tools that we have now. There were no heart monitors or oxygen readers. Nurses had to rely on what they could see , if the baby was breathing, if the color looked okay, or if they were too cold. The incubators were basically just heated boxes and had to be adjusted by hand. Infections were common and sometimes fatal. Looking at the old picture, the setup doesn’t look very safe by today’s standards, but it was all they had. The nurses who worked then must have had a lot of patience and heart because they did everything manually and had to trust their instincts. 

  

3. How have neonatal incubators evolved technologically, from simple heating boxes to digital life-support systems? 

The modern NICU photo I’m using looks like a whole different world. The incubator has screens, buttons, and sensors that can track every little thing a baby does. The temperature and oxygen are perfectly controlled, and alarms go off if something changes. It’s really amazing how far the technology has come. The newer incubators also make it easier for parents to touch or hold their babies, which helps bonding. It’s not just about keeping the baby alive anymore, it’s about helping them grow and making the environment feel more natural and calm. 

  

4. How has the role of nurses and parents changed in the care of premature babies? 

Years ago, parents didn’t have much of a role at all. They weren’t even allowed to touch their babies most of the time because doctors worried about germs. Now, parents are a big part of NICU care. Nurses actually encourage them to be hands-on, like doing skin-to-skin contact, which helps the baby’s heart rate and breathing (March of Dimes). As a nurse myself, I know how much that matters. And as a mom who had a premature baby, I can say the emotional part is just as important as the medical part. Standing by the incubator every day, watching all those monitors, and waiting for good news,  it’s something you never forget. 

  

5. What impact has modern neonatal care had on survival rates, costs, and long-term outcomes for premature infants? 

Nowadays, the survival rate for premature babies is way better than it used to be. Even babies born really early can make it with the right care. I read that in the past, babies born before 30 weeks usually didn’t live, but now even 23- or 24-week babies sometimes survive (NIH). The machines and medicines have come a long way. Of course, NICU care is expensive, and some families struggle with that part. But for most people, it’s worth it if it means their baby gets a chance. Modern medicine has turned what used to be almost impossible into something that’s expected. 

  

6. How does the comparison between past and present NICUs reflect broader changes in how society values life, technology, and care? 

When I look at both pictures, I see how much things have changed, not just in hospitals, but in the way people care. The old incubator photo feels kind of cold and experimental, like the babies were being studied. The new one feels warm and hopeful, like everyone’s working together to give the baby a real chance. I think this shows how far we’ve come as a society. We value life more and use technology to protect it, not just test it. As both a nurse and a mom, I feel proud of how much care has evolved. 

  

Works Cited 

National Institutes of Health. “Infant Mortality and Neonatal Care Advancements.” NIH.gov, 2023, https://www.nih.gov/. 

March of Dimes. “Preterm Birth and Its Complications.” March of Dimes, 2024, https://www.marchofdimes.org. 

Essay 2 Final Draft

Brave New World Dept.: Prompt Diagnosis 

Christine Martinez 

Holly Pappas 

English 101 

November 8, 2025 

Introduction 

A lot of people use A.I. now to check their symptoms before calling a doctor. It’s becoming normal in healthcare, but it also makes people wonder how safe it really is. In the article “Brave New World Dept.: Prompt Diagnosis,” Dhruv Khullar explains how A.I. can help doctors and patients, but he also points out the problems it can cause. I also read a short piece from the Mayo Clinic that says online symptom checkers and A.I. should be used carefully because they can be wrong (“Symptom Checkers”). Both sources show that A.I. can be helpful, but people still need real medical advice from real medical professionals. 

Summary 

In “Brave New World Dept.: Prompt Diagnosis,” Dhruv Khullar talks about how A.I. is becoming a bigger part of medical care. He starts with the story of Matthew Williams, a man who had stomach problems for years. He went to different doctors but still didn’t get answers. When he typed his symptoms into ChatGPT, the A.I. suggested that oxalates might be causing his issues. This ended up being correct, and changing his diet helped him. Khullar uses this example to show how A.I. can sometimes help when doctors haven’t found the answer yet. 

Khullar then explains how A.I. systems are being used to train medical students. He talks about an A.I. tool called CaBot that was tested at Harvard. CaBot solved a very hard medical case in just a few minutes, while the doctor it was compared to took weeks to figure it out. Khullar says A.I. can go through a huge amount of information very fast, which is something humans cannot do on their own. He also explains that doctors might use A.I. to get quick first ideas for diagnoses or to double-check their thoughts, almost like getting a second opinion. 

Even though A.I. can be helpful, Khullar makes it clear that it also has problems. He shares examples of times when A.I. gave dangerous or totally wrong advice. One man got sick because A.I. told him to use a bad salt substitute. Khullar says A.I. can “hallucinate,” meaning it gives answers that sound confident but are not true. He also talks about privacy concerns and warns that doctors could lose some of their thinking skills if they depend too much on A.I. 

Khullar also says that A.I. is being used in other countries, like Kenya, where doctors use a system called AI Consult to check their own diagnoses. He calls this a “centaur” approach, which means humans and A.I. working together. He explains that A.I. is most helpful with unusual or complicated cases. For regular, common problems, A.I. doesn’t really add much. Khullar ends by saying A.I. should support doctors, not replace them, and that real medical decisions still need human judgment. 

Response 

I connected with this article right away because I had a similar experience to one of the examples. Not long ago, I looked up why my TSH and T4 levels were high. Google told me I had hyperthyroidism. I already knew I had hypothyroidism, so I was confused and honestly a little scared. I ended up calling my doctor, and they explained that a high TSH means the thyroid is underactive. What Google told me was the complete opposite. This experience showed me exactly what Khullar meant when he said A.I. can sound confident but still be wrong. 

I also understand what Khullar says about how people use A.I. as a quick check before they talk to a doctor. That’s exactly what I did. The Mayo Clinic says symptom checkers should only be used for basic information and not for real diagnosing (“Symptom Checkers”). That makes sense because A.I. doesn’t know your full medical history. It doesn’t know anything personal about you. It just gives an answer based on typing. In my case, the answer didn’t match what was actually going on with my body. 

Overall, I agree with Khullar that A.I. can be helpful as long as people don’t depend on it too much. It can give ideas or help someone know what to ask their doctor, but it shouldn’t take the place of real medical care. My experience showed me why you always have to double-check with a doctor. A.I. might have a lot of information, but it doesn’t know me the way my doctor does. After going through that, I know I won’t rely on A.I. for anything serious again. 

Works Cited 

Khullar, Dhruv. “Brave New World Dept.: Prompt Diagnosis.” The New Yorker, 29 Sept. 2025. Gale OneFile: High School Edition, https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=STOM&u=mlin_s_bristcc&id=GALE%7CA856566465&v=2.1&it=r&sid=bookmark-STOM&asid=5ec12c8d. 

“Symptom Checkers: Can You Trust Them?” Mayo Clinic, 2024, www.mayoclinic.org/symptom-checkers. 

Peer Review of 1st draft Essay 2

Peer Review for “Brave New World Dept: Prompt Diagnosis” by Brianna Lauriano 

1. How is the essay structured, and does it follow assignment guidelines? 

The essay does a good job of following the assignment. It begins with a short introduction that clearly describes the topic, then it goes into a full summary of the article, and ends with a personal response. The order makes sense and is easy to follow. There is a nice flow between each part. The introduction could use a little more information about the author or where the article came from, but other than that, it follows the rules and has a good structure. 

2. Is the summary complete, accurate, and concise? 

Yes, the summary includes the main points of Dhruv Khullar’s article. It sticks to the facts and doesn’t add any personal opinions to the article. The author uses good examples, like Mathew Williams and the CaBot experiment, to show that AI can be helpful but also dangerous. Some sentences could be made shorter or put together because some parts say the same thing about AI being both useful and dangerous. But overall it’s a strong and detailed summary that shows you really understood the article. 

3. Does the writer handle the source ethically? 

Yes, the writer gives the author credit by name multiple times and doesn’t copy any phrases directly from the article. The writer wrote everything in their own words. They did a good job of handling the source, and it doesn’t sound like it was copied. 

4. Are paragraphs focused, well-developed, and coherent? 

Each paragraph focuses on one clear idea, and everything connects back to the main topic. The summary paragraphs talk about different examples from the article, and the response paragraphs talk about personal experiences that back up what the author says. The only suggestion is to make a few long sentences shorter and maybe break up one or two big paragraphs into smaller ones to make them easier to read. But the essay makes sense all the way through and stays on topic. 

5. Is the response substantive? 

Yes, the response is strong and personal. The writer gives two real-life examples from her own life that fit the topic . They show how easy it is to get bad medical advice from AI or Google. These stories make the essay more relatable and interesting. The last paragraph also makes the main point clear: AI can help, but it can’t take the place of human healthcare providers.  

Overall comments for the writer: 

Overall, the essay is well-organized, easy to read, and written in a clear way. It shows that you really understood the article and made good connections to your own life. Just check for any places where you say the same thing more than once. I know I’ve had the same problem with repeating. This is a great rough draft though. I can’t wait to read the final version. 

Essay 2 Rough Draft

Brave New World Dept.: Prompt Diagnosis
Rough Draft
Christine Martinez
Holly Pappas
English 101
October 18, 2025

Introduction
More and more people are using AI to help them figure out what’s wrong with them medically. Today AI is becoming more common in healthcare. Dhruv Khullar’s article “Brave New World Dept.: Prompt Diagnosis” talks about how A.I. is already helping doctors and patients, but it can also make big mistakes. He talks about the good and bad things about A.I. in medicine, showing that it can be useful but also dangerous if not used carefully.

Summary
In “Brave New World Dept.: Prompt Diagnosis,” Dhruv Khullar starts by telling the story of Matthew Williams, who had digestive problems for years after a surgery. He went to a lot of doctors, but none of them could tell him what was wrong. When he finally typed his symptoms into ChatGPT, an A.I. program, it suggested that foods high in oxalate might be to blame for his problems. This turned out to be true, and after Williams changed his diet, his symptoms got better. Khullar uses this story to show how A.I. can sometimes do better than doctors, giving patients answers that might take years to find otherwise. In the article Khullar talks about how doctors have always tried to solve medical mysteries by looking at things and thinking about them. He compares this old way of doing things to the new way of diagnosing things with computers. He talks about an A.I. system called CaBot that was created at Harvard and tested against a real doctor. Both were given the same difficult case, and it was surprising that CaBot figured out the right diagnosis in just a few minutes. The doctor it was competing with took weeks to find out what the diagnosis was. Khullar gives the A.I. credit for thinking like a human doctor, which shows that it can quickly process medical data and even explain its thinking to an audience. A lot of people who saw the demonstration were impressed, and it showed how far A.I. has come in understanding medicine.


Khullar also says that A.I. is not perfect, though. He gives other examples of when A.I. gave dangerous or completely wrong advice. For instance, one man asked ChatGPT for a salt substitute and was told to use bromide, which ended up poisoning him. The writer says that these programs can sometimes “hallucinate,” which means they create false information that sounds real. Khullar says that AI doesn’t really understand things; it just makes answers based on data. Because of this, it can say things with confidence that are completely wrong. He also worries about privacy because people’s medical records can be stored and shared without their knowledge. These examples show that A.I. can be impressive, but it can also be misleading and even dangerous.


Khullar goes on to talk about how AI is being used all over the world. Like in Kenya, a program called AI Consult helps doctors double-check diagnoses. The author says that over time, the doctors who used it made fewer mistakes. He calls this way of working together between people and machines a “centaur” approach, which means both sides work together. But he also talks about the danger of “cognitive de-skilling,” which is when doctors lose the ability to think for themselves if they rely on A.I. too much. Khullar says that in the end, A.I. should help doctors, not replace them. He thinks that technology can make healthcare better if it is used the right way, but that humans still need to use their judgment to make the best medical decisions.

Response
I could really relate to what the author said about how A.I. can be both useful and harmful at the same time. I recently used A.I. to look up what my blood test results meant. I asked Google what it meant that my TSH and T4 levels were high. Immediately It told me that I had hyperthyroidism, which is when the thyroid is overactive. I was confused because I know I have a diagnosis of hypothyroidism, which is the opposite problem. How could it change that drastically? I called the doctor and got clarification that a higher th number on the reading meant the lower the thyroid is working. That experience showed me how easy it is to get the wrong information when you rely on A.I. or Google for medical questions. I asked a clear, simple question and got a confident but incorrect answer. I think my experience backs up one of Khullar’s main points: A.I. sounds smart and confident, but it doesn’t really get the human body or the situation, the whole picture. It can’t see all of the lab results, ask follow-up questions, or notice other signs of health problems like a doctor can.


A.I. can be a good place to start learning, but it should never take the place of a real medical provider. Always double check with a medical professional. If I had believed what it said, my situation could have caused me a lot of stress that I didn’t need. For a second I was panicked, but quickly took a second to think about it and called the doctor’s office. Overall, I agree with the author that A.I. is helpful but can be dangerous if you don’t use it right. It reminds me that technology should be a tool and not a substitute for people. A.I. might know a lot of information, but it doesn’t know me, and that’s what makes the difference in real medical care.

Works Cited

Brave New World Dept.: Prompt Diagnosis. – Document – Gale OneFile: High School Edition. (n.d.). https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=STOM&u=mlin_s_bristcc&id=GALE%7CA856566465&v=2.1&it=r&sid=bookmark-STOM&asid=5ec12c8d